Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a trial by the court and judgment of $3,000 and interest ordered for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The plaintiff, receiver of the estate of Michael J. O’Brien, insolvent, duly appointed by the district court of Ramsey county, brings this action to recover of the defendant the proceeds of certain property of the insolvent alleged to have been transferred to her in fraud of his creditors. The court finds upon sufficient evidence that Michael J. O’Brien was, on the 18th day of April, 1889, insolvent, and was at that date the owner of a stock of goods in the city of St. Paul of the value of $9,000 and upwards, which constituted all his estate and property of every name and nature; and that at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southard v. . BennerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Merrill v. ResslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. McLeod v. First National BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Prondzinski v. GarbuttNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stephon v. TopicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Rossman v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Darling v. HarmonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API