Legal Opinion

State v. Grover

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 23, 1989No. 22048-9-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

Kenneth Peeler appeals his conviction for first degree robbery. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence. He also contends that he was denied a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

I

1. Procedural facts.

Peeler and his codefendant, Robert Grover, were charged with two counts of first degree robbery. Grover waived his right to a jury. The trial court ruled that Peeler and Grover would be tried simultaneously, but the court would decide Grover's case and the jury Peeler's case. Peeler neither objected to this procedure,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. StoppleworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HurshCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Interest of D.P.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API