Cascade Broadcasting Group, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission, Trc Communications, Inc., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
Before MIKVA, BUCKLEY and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Appellant Cascade Broadcasting Group, Ltd., (“Cascade”) seeks review of a decision rendered by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) after a comparative hearing. In the contested decision, the agency denied appellant’s application to construct a new television broadcast station and simultaneously granted the competing application of intervenor TRC Communications, Inc. (“TRC”).
The Commission has filed a motion for summary affirmance of its action. Upon…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- James Walker v. Walter E. Washington, Mayor District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Ronald G. Sills v. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Cleveland Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Channel 19, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Victor Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Station Wabz, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
4Cited by6 opinions
- Harbor Insurance Company v. StokesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Harbor Insurance v. StokesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- City of Vernon, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Northern California Power Agency, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.