Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

Before the Court is the question of whether the efficacy of a Workers’ Compensation Compromise and Release (C & R) Agreement can be attacked on the basis that a claimant was.mentally incompetent to comprehend what she was agreeing to or whether such an attack is precluded by the doctrine of collateral estoppel.1 This is an issue of first impression, and has far-reaching consequences. Marcella Stiles (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) that upheld the order of Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) Charles A. Getty, dismissing the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lindemuth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Farner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Ocasio v. OllsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Gregory v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Central Transport & Cherokee Ins. Inc. v. WCAB (Thornton)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API