Lindsey v. Veasy
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Bike Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. H. Austill. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The present controversy arose out of an exchange of lands. Lindsey conveyed to Yeasy and his sisters two hundred acres of land in Jefferson county, for two hundred and eighty acres in Pike county, conveyed by Yeasy and his sisters to Lindsey. Neither Yeasy nor his sisters had ever seen the lands in Jefferson county prior to the purchase. Each conveyed by deed with warranty. Each party took possession under the purchase, but Yeasy did not obtain possession of the entire lands purchased. At the end. of a year, Yeasy abandoned the possession of the lands conveyed to him and his sisters, and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelly's Heirs v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Lanier v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Walton v. BonhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Prout v. Roberts' Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shahan v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Jackson v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Porter v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Baxter v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Tarrance v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.