Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. McGinnes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 8, 1959No. 12796PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal which has been perfected and allowed as provided by Section 1292(b) of Title 28 United States Code, as amended by the Act of September 2, 1958, Public Law 85-919, 72 Stat. 1770. The sole question we consider, in reviewing the district court’s denial of motions to dismiss the complaint, is whether the complaint states a claim within federal jurisdiction.1
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, a corporate agency of the State of Pennsylvania, brought this action in the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in an effort to obtain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Houston v. OrmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of New Jersey v. MoriarityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. LongDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Bullock v. LathanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1960
- Oil City National Bank v. DudleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. McGinnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.