Legal Opinion

West v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 24, 2020No. 4:18-cv-03340Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 24, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION DAMIEN WEST, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:18-CV-3340 § UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD § COMPANY, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 21. After reviewing the motion, the response, and the applicable law, the motion is DENIED. I. Background The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise indicated. Defendant Union Pacific employed Plaintiff Damien West in 2005 to work as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. EchazabalSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Michael Nall v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. Solo Serve Corporation v. Westowne AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API