Legal Opinion

Verna v. Coler

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 6, 1990No. 89-5363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue on appeal is whether the Federal Food Stamp voluntary quit regulation, 7 C.F.R. 273.7(c), and the regulation defining “head of household” as the household’s “primary wage earner,” 7 C.F.R. 273.1(d)(2) are inconsistent with the Federal Food Stamp Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2011 et seq., or are valid as a permissible construction of the Act in the exercise of the Secretary’s delegated powers. The district court upheld the validity of the regulations and entered summary judgment in favor of the Secretary.

The undisputed facts are that Verna’s household included her two children and her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Verna v. ColerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1990
  3. Valenzuela v. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Maine Association Of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Commissioner, Maine Department Of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Jeanette Verna, in Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Gregory L. Coler, Secretary, Department of Health Rehabilitative Services, Defendant-Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard E. Lyng, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API