Kincade v. General Tire and Rubber Co.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NOWLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court in this cause is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Assessment of Interest on Judgment. After carefully considering the grounds for said motion, as well as Defendants’ response thereto, and after having heard oral argument of counsel on the motion on January 11,1982, the Court is of the opinion that the motion is not meritorious and should be denied. A full understanding of the Court’s reasons for denial of the motion requires a brief statement of the history of this lawsuit.
In February of 1975, Plaintiffs filed this class action suit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cotton v. HintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Rush PETTWAY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Parker v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1693, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,517 Paris Kincade v. General Tire and Rubber Co., and William F. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,062 C. Robert Young, National Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. Lawrence G. Katz, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vicki Linneman v. Vita-Mix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Handschu v. Special Services DivisionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- In Re Connaught Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Parsons & Whittemore Alabama MacHinery and Services Corporation and Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. v. Yeargin Construction Company, Inc., Yeargin Construction Company, Inc. v. Parsons & Whittemore Alabama MacHinery and Services Corporation and Parsons & Whittemore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re AcostaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.