Legal Opinion

In Re Sharp

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2006No. 06-0061PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice MEDINA and Justice GREEN joined.

In this companion case to In re Francis,1 Jim Sharp, a candidate for the First Court of Appeals, Place 9, filed his application, petition, and filing fee with the Texas Democratic Party. Although a Party official reviewed Sharp’s filing and assured him that everything was in order, he was later notified that he would not be certified as a candidate because his application had not been notarized. Because Sharp could have remedied this defect had the Party pointed it out rather than overlooked it, we hold…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fernandez v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re AngeliniTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re AngeliniTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re AngeliniTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re SharpTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sheryl Sachtleben v. Phillip Bennett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API