Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Bedford Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2014No. Docket No. 314125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner appeals as of right a final opinion and judgment of the Michigan Tax Tribunal in which the tribunal determined that petitioner is not entitled to a principal residence exemption (PRE) under MCL 211.7cc. We reverse and remand.

Petitioner’s husband, Richard, owned a home before he and petitioner married. Richard passed away in August 2011. His will provided petitioner a life estate in the home, and provided his children a future interest in the home. A deed granting petitioner’s life estate was drafted on January 16, 2012. Respondent denied petitioner’s request for a PRE for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klooster v. City of CharlevoixMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Johnson v. PastorizaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cherry Growers, Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing & Bargaining BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Wengel v. WengelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ann Breakey v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Ann Breakey v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Department of Transportation v. Outfront Media LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Swiss Farms Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API