Legal Opinion

George Wiedemann Brewing Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 22, 1927No. Docket No. 7955Published

1. Deduction for obsolescence of tangible property determined as to amounts and years for which deduction is applicable. 2. An allowance for obsolescence based upon the decrease in value of tangible assets retained in use, denied.

1Opinion of the Court

APPEAL OF GEORGE WIEDEMANN BREWING CO. AND WALTER B. WEAVER, AS A STOCKHOLDER, ETC. 1

George Wiedemann Brewing Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 7955.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

9 B.T.A. 792; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2511;

December 22, 1927, Promulgated

1. Deduction for obsolescence of tangible property determined as to amounts and years for which deduction is applicable.

2. An allowance for obsolescence based upon the decrease in value of tangible assets retained in use, denied.

James B. O'Donnell, Esq., for the petitioners.

Maxwell E. McDowell, Esq., for the Commissioner.

MILLIKEN

This proceeding results…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manhattan Brewing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  2. Levine Bros. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  3. George Wiedemann Brewing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API