Legal Opinion

Schulze v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 28, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Most of the questions arising in this case may he disposed of in considering the motion to dismiss the appeal. The reason in support of that motion, that the appeal was taken pending a motion for a new trial and before the judgment was rendered, has, by agreement of counsel, been waived and abandoned. Another ground, that the exception was not signed during the term at which the case was tried, and that the order extending the time was not passed during that term, has been relied on, hut we think it very clear it cannot he sustained. The rule of Court set out in the record, provides that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Scarlett v. Academy of MusicCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Townshend ex rel. W. & S. Wyman & Co. v. ChewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  4. Crockett v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
  5. Griffin v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meyer v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Concannon v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Hamilton v. ThirstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Schuck v. BrambleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Catanzara Di Giorgio Co. v. F. W. Stock & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API