Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Moore Brothers Co v. Brown & Root Inc

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2000No. 99-1232 to 99-1237Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilkins, Circuit Judge

The majority opinion affirms the grant of summary judgment against Highlands Insurance Co. (Highlands), affirms the judgments in favor of Moore Brothers Co., Inc. (Moore) and The Lane Construction Corporation (collectively, “the Subcontractors”) with respect to the “change in scope” claims, and reverses the ruling of *728the district court that the pay-when-paid clauses do not apply to the early completion bonus, remanding the early completion bonus claims to the district court for further proceedings. The majority opinion also affirms the denial of the Subcontractors’ request for prejudgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. OBS Co., Inc. v. Pace Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Galloway Corp. v. S.B. Ballard Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  3. United States v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Whitt v. GodwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  5. Jane Doe v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API