Legal Opinion

Foster v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 29, 1932No. Docket No. 32984Published

The transfers here involved were not made in contemplation of death.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLARD FOSTER, SARA FOSTER WILSON AND GRACE FOSTER THOMAS, EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF N. C. FOSTER, DECEASED, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Foster v. Commissioner

Docket No. 32984.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

25 B.T.A. 414; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1527;

January 29, 1932, Promulgated

The transfers here involved were not made in contemplation of death.

John M. campbell, Esq., and P. M. Beach, Esq., for the petitioners.

A. H. Fast, Esq., for the respondent.

LANSDON

OPINION.

LANSDON: The respondent has asserted a deficiency in estate tax in the amount of $13,663.92. The only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Foster v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  3. Heipershausen v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API