State v. Taylor
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
Appellant, a Negro about thirty years of age, was convicted of rape and a sexrtence of death by electrocution imposed. The oxxly questioxi raised by the exceptions is whether the Court below erred in refusing a motioxi for a new trial upoxi the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. There was no motion for a directed verdict.
In studying the record after the case was argued, we concluded there was a serious question as to whether the method pursued by the officers in seeking to aid the prosecutrix in identifying appellant by his voice violated the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Beachem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- State v. O'NealSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. PittsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Leo P. Reistroffer v. United States of America, W. L. Rogers v. United States of America, Marvin Norris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.