M2 Software Inc. v. Viacom Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
M2 Software appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Viacom. Because the facts are known to the parties, we will not recite them in detail except as necessary. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
To prevail on its claim of trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Act, M2 Software must show (1) that it has a valid mark entitled to protection under the Act, and (2) that Viacom’s mark creates a likelihood of confusion. See Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entm’t Corp., 174 F.3d 1036, 1046 (9th Cir.1999).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. Skg Studio, Dba Dreamworks SkgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books Usa, Inc., a Corporation Dove Audio, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peaceable Planet, Inc. v. Ty, Inc. And H. Ty WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- M2 Software, Inc. v. Madacy EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- M2 Software, Inc. v. Madacy EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- M2 Software Inc. v. Viacom Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007