Legal Opinion
State v. Ermers
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 30, 2011No. 2010AP2634PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
VERGERONT, PJ.
¶ 1. The issue on this appeal concerns the pleading requirements of a petition for discharge from a commitment as a sexually violent person under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2009-10).1 The statutory language in dispute is the requirement in § 980.09(1)2 that the petition must allege "facts from which the court or jury may conclude the person's *454condition has changed since the date of his or her initial commitment order so that the person does not meet the criteria for commitment as a sexually violent person." We conclude that the "change" referred to in this sentence includes not only a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- State v. RachelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017