Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Karl

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1946No. 6719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSGOWITZ, District Judge.

These are two motions. The first one made by the defendants requiring, “That the Plaintiff file a bond as security for costs in the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) and for attorneys’ fees as provided in Title 35 U.S.C.A. § 70, as amended August 1, 1946, Public Law 587 of the 79th Congress”. The second one, by the plaintiff for leave to file an amended complaint.

Pursuant to Civil Rule 45 of this court whenever a procedural question arises which is not covered by the provisions of any statute of the United States, or of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson Steels, Inc. v. SeidmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. Fischer v. KarlDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949
  3. Di Filippo v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API