Legal Opinion

Albert v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 1984No. 0041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

This is a paternity case; the trial judge found that appellant mother failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent is the father of the child. We affirm.

In appeals from the family court, we may determine the issues in keeping with our view of the preponderance of the evidence. Edwards v. Harris, S. C., 304 S. E. (2d) 638 (1983); Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S. C. 81, 221 S. E. (2d) 773 (1976). However, our duty to review the challenged findings of fact does not require us to ignore the fact that the trial judge, who saw and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Edwards v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Gibbs v. G.K.H., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Calcutt v. CalcuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Calcutt v. CalcuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API