Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided January 25, 1991No. IP 90-91-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON DEFENDANT BRIAN AHERN’S MOTION FOR ACQUITTAL

TINDER, District Judge.

Counsel for defendant Brian Ahern moved for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s case. His motion was taken under advisement at that time, and he rested without presenting evidence. After the instructions were read to the jury, counsel for Ahern renewed the motion and the court retained the motion under advisement. Following the return verdicts of guilty against Ahern by the jury on January 17, 1991, this court announced that a judgment of acquittal would be entered in favor of defendant Ahern.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. Richard BeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Beverly J. Ramsey, Michael J. Marshall, Stuart A. McCreary and James Joseph O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Ronald Leaching, United States of America v. Jerome TremontCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. William E. Miller, William L. Phillips, and Sherry J. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. William E. Miller, William L. Phillips, and Sherry J. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API