Legal Opinion

State v. Massengill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 1990No. 10-87-10050; CA A50085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals her convictions, on stipulated facts, for unlawful possession, manufacture and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4); ORS 475.992(1).1 She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence found during a search of her apartment and statements made sometime after the search. The trial court held that the police had unlawfully “seized” defendant’s apartment but found that defendant freely and voluntarily consented to a subsequent search and made the incriminating statements “when confronted with the evidence” found as a result of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. MatsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. VermaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API