Legal Opinion

Umphrey v. Emery

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Debt by Philip Umphrey against Harry B. Emery and others upon a bail bond. Prom a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error,

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action for malicious prosecution, by capias, against Henderson, who was arrested, and gave bail to the sheriff, and, subsequently, to the action, defendants being sureties, in the sum of $500. Upon a trial, the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $250 and costs, which.were taxed at $65. The judgment was entered December 3, 1897, and costs were taxed December 8, 1897, and on the same day a fieri facias, returnable December 29, 1897, was placed in the hands of the sheriff.. On December 8, 1897, the defendants produced Henderson before a circuit court commissioner of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cheetham v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1806

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karasiewicz v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Co. v. CryanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API