Conley v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court. September term, 1893.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
1. Mr. Hill, as solicitor-general of the Atlanta circuit, prosecuted Beuben, Frank A. and Beuben B. Arnold for an assault upon Conley. By virtue of his connection with this criminal case, he necessarily acquired from Conley, the prosecutor, a full knowledge of all the facts involved in the difficulty between him and the accused. Afterwards Conley brought an action for damages against the Arnolds because of the beating- they had inflicted upon him. In this case Mr. Hill appeared as counsel for the defendants, and represented them so successfully that the trial resulted in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ransone v. ChristianSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Gaulden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Hardin v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
3Cited by26 opinions
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- McDaniel v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Conley v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Corvair Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. BullCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Summerlin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.