Ryder v. Holt
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW XORK. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
It was stipulated in the Circuit Court that this cause should abide the event of Menendez v. Holt, ante, 514, just decided, and the <;same decree in favor of complainants was, therefore, rendered in this as in that case. But it is now assigned for error that, as defendant and' complainants below were citizens of the same State, and the bill did not allege that the trade-mark' in controversy was “ used on goods intended to be transported to a foreign country,” Act of March 3, 1881, c. 138, § 11,. 21 Stat. 502, the Circuit Court had no jurisdiction, and the decree must be reversed for that…
2Cited by18 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Cham. of Com.District Court, N.D. California · 1972
- Youngs Rubber Corporation v. CI Lee & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- Kohler Manuf'g Co. v. BeeshoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.