Eichacker v. New York Telephone Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover from the defendant the sum of $203.50, alleged to represent the difference between business and residence rates for telephone service from March 1, 1923, to November 1, 1936. The complaint sets forth a cause of action in contract and alleges facts showing the defendant’s violation of certain provisions of the Public Service Law, the tariffs and rate schedules filed as required by law. Plaintiff also seeks to recover reasonable counsel fees pursuant to section 93 of the Public Service Law.
At the conclusion of the trial, no question of fact…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adams v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Costello v. . CostelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Spallholz v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lipp v. EdisonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993