Legal Opinion

Corser v. Kindred

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This action was brought in the district court for Crow Wing county, and tried before Sleeper, J., who directed a verdict for defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

The action is in ejectment, the complaint alleging title in the plaintiff, and that the defendant wrongfully withholds the premises. The answer denies plaintiff’s allegation of title, and alleges title in the defendant. On these pleadings the parties went to trial. On the trial it was stipulated that November 27, 1883, the then owners of the premises executed a mortgage thereon to defendant, and that, default having been made, he foreclosed the mortgage by advertisement, and became the purchaser at the sale, August 10, 1885; that there was no redemption; and that since August 10,1886,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HultbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  2. Falconer v. CochranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Hawkins v. GrishamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Stammers v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Smith v. National Credit InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API