People v. Husband
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions from Kent Circuit. cited: 2 Hast P. U., 555; Bex v. Williams, 1 O. & K., 195; Arclib. Or. Pr. & PI. (notes'), p. 361-2 (2). cited: 2 Bish. Grim. L., 829; and cases cited; Lealce v. The State, 10 Humph., 479.
1Opinion of the Court
MARSTON, J:
An information was filed against the respondent charging him with having fraudulently and feloniously secured and converted to his own use, certain trunks and other property of the value of fifty-five dollars, without the consent of the owner thereof, and that he thereby in manner aud form aforesaid, feloniously did steal and carry away the same contrary to the statute, otc.
*307The statute under which the information was filed reads as follows:
“If any person to whom any money, goods, or other property which may be the subject of larceny, shall have been delivered, shall embezzle, or…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Rand v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- King v. BrewerMichigan Supreme Court · 1899