Legal Opinion

Dozier v. City of Gatesville

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1932No. 962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarous, J.

In February, 1926, appellee passed the necessary ordinance and made the legal assessments against the abutting property for three-fourths of the cost for the paving of certain streets within its corporate limits, and let the contract for said paving to appellant. Under the terms of the paving contract appellant was not obligated to pave any of said streets unless he could make proper arrangements with the abutting property owners to give liens on their respective properties for said paving. Under a verbal agreement the asphalt for the paving was shipped to Gates-ville in the name of appellee,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sluder v. City of San AntonioTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Greer v. Hunt CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Prescott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Austin Bros. v. Montague CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Coryell County v. Burke & CorbettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Corpus Christi v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. County of Angelina v. O'QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Carl T. Wibbenmeyer v. TechTerra Communications, Inc. Christian Behier And Adella Almazan-Seabolt, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  4. Carl T. Wibbenmeyer v. TechTerra Communications, Inc. Christian Behier And Adella Almazan-Seabolt, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API