Legal Opinion

Carr v. Ganz

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 2018No. A-17-161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Inbody, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Richard Carr appeals the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court's denial of his motion to compel Gordon Ganz, doing *16 business as G & H Farms, to pay for Carr's coronary artery bypass procedure. Specifically, Carr appeals the compensation court's orders on December 23 and 30, 2016, and January 19, 2017. Because we conclude the December 30, 2016, order modified the December 23 order to reserve disposition of some of the issues, the December 23 order was not final and appealable until the January 19, 2017, order. Thus, we find Carr's February 7 notice of appeal was timely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kimminau v. Uribe Refuse Service & EMC InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USANebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Marlow v. Maple Manor ApartmentsNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Larsen v. D B Feedyards, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parks v. Hy-VeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API