Crume v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES KREGER, Justice.
Appellant Blake Austen Crume appeals from the trial court’s revocation of his community supervision and adjudication of guilt. Crume challenges his conviction on two grounds contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to accept his guilty plea and that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
In April 2005, a grand jury indicted Crume for aggravated assault. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02 (West Supp. 2010). Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Crume entered a plea of guilty to the offense…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Manuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Fairfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Trejo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maricela Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Benito Santos Aguilar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Bobby McDade v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
- James Dylin West v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2026
- James Mark Baker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.