Mahan v. Hendricks

Action of habeas corpus by appellant for possession of his infant daughter. The error assigned is in overruling the motion for a new trial, and the sole question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence.

1

Pour questions are sought to be presented upon the admission of evidence, but the record shows that there was no objection made in two instances, and the other two were upon the grounds of remoteness, and not involving the custody of the child. The questions involved the conduct of the appellant as throwing some light upon his past history, and as his fitness to have the custody of the…