Legal Opinion

Ricigliano v. Peat, Marwick, Main & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 21, 1991No. 91-1215PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

585 So.2d 387 (1991)

Daniel RICIGLIANO, Louis Benarducci, Robert Barnwell, Anthony Masiello, M. Jacqueline Henwood, Charles Paladino, Russel Pizzutto, David Modica, Eleanor Modica, Deborah W. Scoppechio, Robert A. Scoppechio, John R. Modica, Donna M. Modica, Robert Rohe, Samuel Rich, Martin Kamin, Linda Kamin, Individually, and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants,

v.

PEAT, MARWICK, MAIN & COMPANY, Timothy Hart, Henry Gayer, and Keith Cobb, All Individually and Jointly, Appellees.

No. 91-1215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 21, 1991.

Rehearing and…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neale v. AycockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Horowitz ex rel. Meridian 17 Corp. v. United Investors Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sauder v. RaymanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. REWJB Gas Inv. v. Land O'Sun RealtyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Fla. Crushed Stone v. Travelers Indem.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. POLARIS PUBLIC INCOME v. EinhornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Pilevsky v. Morgans Hotel Group ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API