Legal Opinion

Sager v. Hunter Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 24, 1987No. 86 C 5923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETZENDANNER, District Judge:

Plaintiff Daniel Sager brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against defendants Hunter Corporation, Malcolm Somsag, Russel Irish, and Commonwealth Edison. Before the court are motions of the defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated herein, the motions are all granted.

The facts of plaintiffs complaint, which the court takes as true on this motion, are that the defendants demoted and then eventually discharged plaintiff because he…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Reliable Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Payne v. Cook County HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  3. Wisniewski v. Commonwealth EdisonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  4. 47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 607, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,144 Deanna L. Brown v. Reliable Sheet Metal Works, Inc., Commonwealth Edison Company, and Russell IrishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Junco v. Advocate Aurora HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API