Legal Opinion

Boston v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 2011No. 32A01-1008-CR-421PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Brett Boston brings this interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress the results of his blood alcohol test.

We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying Boston’s motion to suppress.

2. Whether the trial court erred in retroactively applying recent legislative amendments to the applicable statute in its determination of Boston’s claim.

FACTS

On October 11, 2009, Boston was arrested on suspicion of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. 1 Boston requested a blood alcohol test, also known as a blood draw. He was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cole v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Kelley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Bourbon Mini-Mart, Inc. v. Gast Fuel & Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woodson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State of Indiana v. David BisardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Kolish v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Courtney A. Wuethrich v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API