Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Noland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1907No. 14,907PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Miami district court; Winfield H. Sheldon, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

This is an action to recover damages sustained on account of a fire alleged to have been set out by the plaintiff in error. Judgment was given for the plaintiff in the district court of Miami county, and the railroad company brings the case here for review.

The plaintiff, S. A. Noland, resides on a farm two and a half miles north of Paola, in Miami county. On this farm he had an orchard. On November 15, 1904, a fire occurred in the orchard, killing about eighty trees. This action was then brought against.the plaintiff in error and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. B. F. Blaker & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GeiserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. LycanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Douglass v. GeilerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marron v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Skaer v. American National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Shanks v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MosherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Evenson v. LilleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API