Legal Opinion

Santis v. Cannata

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 4, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit.

1Opinion of the CourtParkhurst, C. J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by Angelo Di Santis and his wife Maria Di Santis against the defendant, setting up in substance that the plaintiffs bargained and agreed to sell and that the defendant bought of them a certain lot of land with improvements under an agreement referred to in the declaration (a paper, purporting to be a copy being annexed to the declaration); and alleging that the defendant refused to carry out the terms of the sale, and that the plaintiffs thereafter sold the property at a loss of upwards of $700; and plaintiffs seek to recover this loss. The defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Grafton v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Nichols v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  4. Nickerson v. WeldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Lee v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shoag v. SheftelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Storrow v. Concord Club of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API