Waukesha Gas & Electric Co. v. Railroad Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
It is obvious from the foregoing statement of facts that the chief question for review is the validity of the valuation of $335,000 placed upon the property of plaintiff as the basis for the May 1922 rates. If that valuation stands the test of the federal rule the judgment must be affirmed; if it does not it must be reversed.
It appears from the Commission’s decision that it arrived at its valuation by taking that made in 1912 and adding thereto the costs of additions since made, by increasing the land value, and by adding cost of materials and supplies on hand plus working capital. See 13…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pabst Corp. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929