Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Pataki

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 13, 2003No. Docket Nos. 01-7806, 01-7813Published

1Concurrence

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge,

concurring in the judgment on separate grounds:

Insofar as the Court holds that the Statute does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause I concur, but I respectfully dissent from the majority’s interpretation of the Statute to permit home deliveries by local traditional retailers.

The majority opinion rests on an inventive distinction by the District Court between so-called “direct” cigarette sellers and so-called “traditional” or “bricks-and-mortar” cigarette sellers, holding that the Statute prohibits direct sellers from making home deliveries of cigarettes but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API