Legal Opinion

People v. Lindogan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1963No. Crim. 8470PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

The trial court found defendant guilty of three counts of bookmaking in violation of subdivisions 1, 2 and 4, section 337a, Penal Code. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and order denying motion for new trial.

The issue relates to probable cause. The evidence viewed in a light most favorable to respondent discloses the following: After receiving information from Officer Maga of the Los Angeles Police Department that bookmaking had been going on at 1557 Rockwood Street, an arrest had been made there a year before and “they” were back in business and working again, and bookmaking was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Willson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. SanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API