Legal Opinion

Meyerowich v. Carrere General Contractors, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 23, 1992No. 91-1440PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELL, Judge.

This appeal and cross appeal arise out of an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and for breach of contract. Appellant contends the trial court erred when it determined at the close of all the evidence that appellant had failed to join an indispensable party and accordingly entered a final judgment of involuntary dismissal. Appellant also contends the trial court erred when it denied Rose Meyerowich’s motion to intervene in the proceedings prior to the entry of the final judgment. We agree and reverse. Appellee has failed to demonstrate error in its points raised on cross appeal.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CITIBANK, NA v. Blackhawk HeatingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Phillips v. ChoateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. DeToro v. Dervan Investments Ltd. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Cross Ranches v. JBC Agricultural ManagementColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Angel Tomas v. Dmitry Sandler, DPMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  3. Gmi, LLC v. Asociación Del Fútbol ArgentinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API