Legal Opinion

People v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the jury verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We disagree. Upon weighing the relative probative force of the conflicting testimony, we conclude that the jury properly gave the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We also reject the contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel. Although counsel’s representation of defendant was not free from error, the evidence, the law and circumstances of this case, viewed in *1026totality and as of the time of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. MichaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. FedoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API