Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Chandler v. McQuillin

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 28, 1910Published

Prohibition.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION.

LAMM, 3.

— Prohibition. A preliminary rule issued here to show cause. On return made,' relator filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The issue *534seeks a review of the pleadings. A synopsis follows:

The petition states that one Miller had a judgment for $5000 against the Transit Company; that relator purchased it and took a transfer; that he then brought a creditor’s bill to hold the United Railways Company liable for its payment; that such equity suit was assigned to the -division of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis presided over by Judge McQuillin; that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Haley v. Eureka County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Barrie v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Meeker v. StraatMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API