State ex rel. Chandler v. McQuillin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Prohibition.
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION.
LAMM, 3.
— Prohibition. A preliminary rule issued here to show cause. On return made,' relator filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The issue *534seeks a review of the pleadings. A synopsis follows:
The petition states that one Miller had a judgment for $5000 against the Transit Company; that relator purchased it and took a transfer; that he then brought a creditor’s bill to hold the United Railways Company liable for its payment; that such equity suit was assigned to the -division of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis presided over by Judge McQuillin; that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Haley v. Eureka County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1891
- Barrie v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Meeker v. StraatMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.