Legal Opinion

James Gagan, Lajunta Monroe, Intervenor-Appellant v. Victor Sharar James A. Monroe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 22, 2004No. 02-15449PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns execution in a community property state of a judgment obtained in a common law state.

Facts

The dispute underlying this case has already been the subject of two published decisions by the Seventh Circuit, so we take our facts from those decisions. James Gagan invested substantial funds in a limited partnership to fund, build, and operate cable television systems. James Monroe was the general partner. Monroe and his associates siphoned off money that Gagan was entitled to, so Gagan sued them in the United States District Court for the Northern District…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Huck v. HaralambieArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rodgers v. BryanArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Alberta Securities Commission v. RyckmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity National Financial, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  2. Brennan v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. PATEL v. JONESUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. Stuart v. Scottsdale, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API