Legal Opinion
Crescent City Seltz & Mineral Water Manufacturing Co. v. Deblieux
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 15, 1888No. 10,043PublishedCited by 8 opinions
APPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans. Houston, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Fenner, J.
The plaintiff took out a writ of attachment against its debtor, Deblieux, under which it seized, in the hands of Henry Tremoulet, a certain share of its own stock which was owned by him. Tremoulet refused to deliver the stock certificate to the sheriff. Thereupon plaintiff filed a supplemental petition, making Tremoulet a party, in which it was alleged that the latter was holding said stoektas a confederate of Deblieux in an attempt to defraud his creditors, and had thereby made himself liable for the debts, and praying judgment against both.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Lake Charles v. LanzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
- State ex rel. Louisiana State Bank v. Bank of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Weissman v. Lincoln CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- In the Matter of J. Lawrence Hill, Debtor. David v. Adler v. J. Lawrence Hill and Whitney National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Garrett v. First State Bank of KingsvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.