Legal Opinion

Braddy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1929No. 19600Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOB BEHEAEING.

A motion for a rehearing was made, in which it is stated that “it appears from the record, which must have been overlooked by the court, that .the amended motion was approved unqualifiedly, but a marginal note [was] made by the trial judge in substantiation and explanation of the approval.” This court did not overlook what appears in the record. The record shows no approval whatever of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. Eollowing these grounds the following appears: “The above and foregoing am'ended motion is hereby allowed, and the same ordered filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API