Legal Opinion

Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2000No. Docket Nos. 111702, 113799, Calendar Nos. 2, 3Published

1Opinion of the Court

614 N.W.2d 607 (2000)

462 Mich. 691

John MUDEL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Deborah L. Connaway, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Welded Construction Company and Hartford Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 111702, 113799, Calendar Nos. 2, 3.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued January 11, 2000.

Decided July 25, 2000.

Daniel M. Bridges, Pontiac, for plaintiff-appellee in Mudel.

Martha M. Glaser, Bloomfield Hills, for the plaintiff-appellant in Connaway.

Humphrey, Hannon, Moriarity & Schoener, P.C. (by Robert J. Humphrey, Donald H. Hannon, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API