Legal Opinion · Dissent

Borg-Warner Insurance Finance Corp. v. Executive Park Ventures

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1990No. A90A1105Published

1DissentSognier, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Although I fully understand the origin of the majority’s reasoning concerning this subject of much confusion in our courts, I cannot agree with its conclusion that OCGA § 13-8-2 (b) applies to the lease in question.

OCGA § 13-8-2 (b) provides in its entirety that “[a] covenant, promise, agreement, or understanding in or in connection with or collateral to a contract or agreement relative to the construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of a building structure, appurtenances, and appliances, including moving, demolition, and excavating connected therewith,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Consultants, Inc. v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Frazer v. City of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Country Club Apartments, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Phenix Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Cash v. Street & Trail, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API