Legal Opinion

In Re TED

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 3, 1984No. 67099PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

169 Ga. App. 401 (1984)

312 S.E.2d 864

IN RE T. E. D.

67099.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided January 3, 1984.

Ralph L. Van Pelt, for appellant.

Arthur E. Mallory III, District Attorney, for appellee.

SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.

In an earlier decision, we remanded this case to the trial court with direction that the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law made pursuant to OCGA § 15-11-33 (a) (Code Ann. § 24A-2201) be reduced to writing. See In re T. E. D., 166 Ga. App. 322 (303 SE2d 777). The trial court having complied, we now turn to the merits of the case.

A hearing on the petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Bailey v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. In re T. E. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. In re T.E.D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Interest of C. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Rocha v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Nobles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API