Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. St. Lawrence County

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a nonsuit made at the St. Lawrence Trial Term, and reserved to he determined after the verdict of a jury, pursuant to section 1187 of the 'Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the CourtRogebs, J.

January 10, 1891, Clara Loraine Richardson died at the town of Herman, in the county of St. Lawrence, leaving a last will and testament, in and by which her husband, Orlo C. Richardson, was named as executor. The •will was admitted to probate by the surrogate of said county, April 13, 1891, the said Orlo duly qualified and letters testamentary were issued to him.

*40The will, in substance, gives to him the use of all the testatrix’ property, together with so much of the principal, to be paid from time to time, as might be required to make him a full and complete support and maintenance.

The will…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maxmilian v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Leitch v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Markey v. . County of QueensNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. De Witt v. . WaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Bosworth v. . VandewalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newman v. SchwertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API